Protocol Pages: Every Solana DeFi Protocol in One Place
We built a page for every Solana DeFi protocol with TVL over $1M. 132 of them, each with live yields, a 10-factor security score, audit history, and the risk profile of its category. Here's what's inside and why we built it this way.
One Page Per Protocol
There are 132 DeFi protocols on Solana with more than $1M in TVL. Most yield dashboards show you a pool, a number, and nothing else. You see 14% APY on a name you half recognize, and the next step is opening five browser tabs to find out whether the protocol behind it has an audit, a multisig, or a track record longer than a quarter.
We built a page for each one. Every protocol in our universe has a protocol page that puts the yield, the security score, the audit history, and the live pools on a single screen. No tabs. No guessing.
This post covers what each page contains, how the 132 break down, and how to read a page before you deposit.
What's on a Protocol Page
Every page is built from the same template, so once you can read one you can read all of them. Here is the structure, top to bottom.
Header with the score. The protocol name, category, current TVL, and a Security Score from 0 to 100. The score is the first thing you see because it is the first thing that should change your behavior. A protocol at 72 and a protocol at 41 paying the same APY are not the same trade.
Live pools. Every pool the protocol runs, with current APY split into base yield and reward yield. Base is the interest or fees the protocol actually generates. Reward is token emissions that can stop. A 12% pool that is 10% base and 2% reward survives the next emissions cliff. A 12% pool that is 3% base and 9% reward does not. We show the split so you are not surprised.
Security breakdown. The score is not a single mystery number. It comes from a 10-factor model covering audits, multisig setup, timelock presence, oracle design, exploit history, and code maturity. The page shows the factors, so you can see whether a 58 is a protocol with good audits and no timelock, or a protocol with a timelock and no audits at all. Those are different risks.
Audit and incident history. Which firms audited the protocol, when, and whether it has ever been exploited. Three protocols in our universe carry an active HACK flag. One is a ZOMBIE, abandoned but still holding deposits. Those flags sit at the top of the page in red, not buried in a footnote.
Category context. Each protocol is graded against its peers. A lending protocol at 63 sits right at its category average. A DEX at 63 is above average for a category that averages 52. The page tells you which, so the score has context instead of floating in a vacuum.
The full methodology behind every factor lives on our security page. The protocol pages are where you apply it.
The 132, Broken Down
Pulling every protocol into one schema makes the shape of the ecosystem obvious. The distribution is not flattering.
| Grade | Score range | Protocols | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| A | 85-100 | 0 | 0% |
| B | 70-84 | 19 | 14% |
| C | 55-69 | 60 | 45% |
| D | 40-54 | 46 | 35% |
| F | 0-39 | 7 | 5% |
Zero protocols score an A. The ecosystem average is 56.1 out of 100. Nearly half sit in the C band, and 40% land in D or F. The single biggest reason is audits, or the lack of them. 77 protocols, 58% of the universe, have no public audit on record at all.
That number reframes how you should read a high APY. The pool paying the most is very often a protocol in the bottom half of this table. The yield is high because the risk is high, and the risk is high because nobody has checked the code.
Risk Lives in the Category
Most of a protocol's risk profile is set before you look at any individual feature. It comes from what the protocol does. Here is how the categories rank by average score.
| Category | Protocols | Avg score | Typical risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| Staking Pool | 5 | 73 | Low |
| Liquidity Manager | 3 | 66 | Active IL, strategy risk |
| Liquid Staking | 28 | 65 | No liquidation, no IL |
| Lending | 10 | 63 | Liquidation, oracles |
| Yield Aggregator | 4 | 63 | Compounded contract risk |
| RWA | 16 | 58 | Custody, centralization |
| DEX / AMM | 17 | 52 | Impermanent loss |
| Derivatives | 8 | 50 | Leverage, oracles, liquidation |
| Bridge | 7 | 48 | Most exploited vector in DeFi |
The pattern is clean. Staking and liquid staking sit at the top because they touch the fewest moving parts. A protocol like Jito earns base inflation plus MEV with one contract and no liquidation engine. Bridges sit at the bottom because they have been the most exploited category in DeFi history, and that history is priced into the score.
This is why we lead with the category on every page. A 60 in liquid staking and a 60 in derivatives are not interchangeable. The first is a slightly below-average protocol in a safe category. The second is an above-average protocol in a dangerous one. The number alone hides that. The page does not.
How to Read a Page Before You Deposit
The pages exist so you can run a five-minute check instead of a five-tab investigation. Here is the order that catches the most problems fastest.
Start with the flags. If there is a HACK or ZOMBIE flag, stop. There are only four flagged protocols in the universe, but they hold real deposits and they show up in yield rankings because their APYs are often high. The flag is there to override the number.
Then read the score against its category, not in isolation. Open the category line and ask whether this protocol is above or below its peers. A lending protocol below 55 is a protocol cutting corners that its competitors are not. A DEX at 55 is normal for the category.
Next, check the yield split. If the headline APY is mostly reward emissions, find out when the program ends. Emissions-heavy yields are not wrong, but they are temporary, and a page that shows 18% today can show 6% the week the rewards stop.
Last, look at the audit line. No audit does not automatically mean avoid, but it moves the protocol into the bottom half of the distribution for a reason. Pair it with the TVL. A protocol with no audit and $4M in TVL is in the 49-protocol group we mark ungradeable, too small and too unchecked to assess properly. A protocol with no audit and $400M in TVL is a different conversation, and the page gives you both numbers to have it.
Why We Built It This Way
DeFiLlama tells you what a protocol earns. It does not tell you whether the protocol deserves your deposit. That gap is the entire reason yieldwire exists, and the protocol pages are where the gap closes.
Putting all 132 on the same schema does something a list of pools cannot. It makes the ecosystem legible. You can see that no protocol scores an A, that more than half have never been audited, and that the highest yields cluster in the lowest-scoring categories. Those facts do not show up when you are staring at a single pool card. They show up when every protocol sits in the same frame.
Browse the full set at yieldwire.xyz/protocols, filter by what matters to you with the risk filter, or jump straight to live yields by category on the yields page. Every page updates as APYs move and as scores change after an upgrade, an audit, or an incident.
The yield is the easy part. The protocol behind it is the part that decides whether you keep your principal. We built a page for each one so that decision takes minutes, not tabs.
This is not financial advice. Security scores reduce risk, they do not remove it. Do your own research, and never deposit more than you can afford to lose.
Track all Solana yields in real time
Compare APYs across lending, LP, and liquid staking protocols on the YieldWire dashboard.
Open Dashboard →